[2023] Artlist Vs Motion Array - 9 MAIN Differences

Which is better; Artlist.io or motionarray.com?

If you're navigating the waters of video editing, marketing, or multimedia production, you've likely encountered two titans in the field: Artlist and Motion Array. Trust me, as someone who has spent years in this industry, the decision between these two platforms is far from trivial.

Artlist and Motion Array each offer a compelling array of high-quality assets, but they cater to different needs and come with their own unique sets of integrated tools. Whether you're looking for cinematic footage, diverse music tracks, or even collaborative editing features, understanding the nuances between these platforms is crucial.

In this article, we'll delve deep into the following:

• The core offerings of Artlist and Motion Array
• Unique features that set each platform apart
• Subscription models and pricing tiers
• Target demographics and ideal use-cases for each platform

By the end of this comprehensive guide, you'll have a clear understanding of which platform aligns best with your creative needs and project requirements. Take it from me, making an informed choice between Artlist and Motion Array can significantly impact the quality and efficiency of your work.

‍

What Is Motion Array?

Motion Array stands out as a comprehensive solution for video editors, marketers, and multimedia professionals. The platform's offerings go beyond the standard fare of stock media. Motion Array provides a wide array of assets, including but not limited to, video footage, music tracks, sound effects, and video templates. Their monthly subscription starts at $29.99, offering unlimited access to these assets, which is a compelling value proposition.

Now, let's delve into what truly sets Motion Array apart—its integrated tools. The platform offers video collaboration and review tools that streamline the editing process. These tools allow multiple stakeholders to provide real-time feedback on a project, thereby expediting project timelines. (Integrated tools are built-in features that enhance the platform's core functionality, making it a more versatile solution for professionals.)

Pros

• Quality of Assets: Many users find the templates and presets to be of professional quality, suitable for various video editing software.
• User-Friendly Features: The platform has been praised for its easy-to-use filters and tutorials, which help users make the most out of their subscriptions.
• Custom Requests: Users can request specific assets that may not be available on the site, and the response time for these requests is reportedly fast.
• Swift Follow-Up Service: Some users have mentioned that the company not only responds quickly but also follows up to ensure that issues are resolved.
• Specialized Support Staff: Reviews indicate that the support team is not just responsive but also skilled and knowledgeable, providing targeted solutions to specific problems.
• Flexible Billing Solutions: While billing issues are a con, some users have noted that the team was willing to adjust invoices based on specific requirements, showing some flexibility in their billing practices.
• Educational Resources: The platform offers a variety of tutorials and learning resources, which many users find helpful for making the most out of their subscriptions.
• Community Praise: Some reviewers specifically mention that they would highly recommend the platform, indicating a level of trust and satisfaction that goes beyond mere utility.

Cons

• Billing Issues: A common complaint is about unexpected charges and difficulties in canceling subscriptions. Some users feel that the cancellation process is intentionally misleading and complicated.
• Misleading Free Trials: Some users have complained that they were charged for an annual subscription when they thought they were signing up for a free trial.
• Lack of Transparency: A few reviews mention a lack of transparency in company practices, especially concerning how much contributors earn per download.
• Quality Control: Some users have reported receiving copyright strikes on platforms like YouTube for using Motion Array's music, suggesting that not all assets are as royalty-free as claimed.
• Complexity in Usage: A few reviews mention that the process to get the assets working on their software was unnecessarily long and complicated.
• Limited Software Compatibility: Some assets are not compatible with all video editing software, which limits the utility of the platform for some users.

Overview

• Rating: 3.2 out of 5 stars based on 605 reviews.
• Positive Reviews: Approximately 69% of the reviews are 5-star.
• Negative Reviews: Around 27% of the reviews are 1-star.
• Customer Service Response: Replies to negative reviews within less than 1 month.

Read Review

‍

What Is Artlist?

Founded in 2015 by Ira Belsky, Artist io has carved out a significant niche in the music licensing industry. Artist io offers a robust library of over 8,000 tracks, and they're not static about it; they add around 150 new tracks every month. This dynamic addition ensures that you have a continually updated resource for your projects.

For the sake for this comparison, I'll be comparing Motion Array with the specific Artlist Max subscription, which includes royalty free.

It's pretty much an all-round asset platform for video creation. Artlist themselves call it the "the Ultimate All-in-One Platform for Creators."

To be specific, here's exactly what's included with Artlist Max:

• Royalty-free music
• Sound effects
• Stock footage
• Video templates
• HitFilm Pro/creator (Pro video editing & compositing software)
• Imerge (image editing app)
• Plugins (for Premiere Pro, After Effects, FinalCut, Davinci Resolve and more)

Pros

• Refund Flexibility: One reviewer mentioned that they had to ask for a refund because the templates they were interested in were not available for their current software. Artlist's customer service was understanding and issued a refund promptly. This shows that the company is willing to accommodate customers even when their needs are not met by the existing services.
• Quick Support Resolution: Another reviewer mentioned that they had a few hiccups that were resolved in less than 24 hours. This indicates that the support team is not just responsive but also effective in problem-solving, which can be crucial for creators who are on tight deadlines.
• Geographically Sensitive Pricing: A reviewer noted that the pricing is not so high "depending on where you live and how much you earn." This suggests that Artlist may have a flexible pricing model that takes into account the economic conditions of different regions, making it more accessible.
• Adaptability of Support Team: One reviewer mentioned that the support team could adapt and offer options for solving problems. This suggests that the support team is not just following a script but is trained to think critically and offer personalized solutions, which can be invaluable for complex or unique issues.
• Ongoing Development: A reviewer who had to ask for a refund due to lack of templates for their software mentioned that Artlist is currently working on updating their templates. This shows that the company is committed to continuous improvement and is responsive to customer needs.
• Fear-Free Publishing: Another reviewer highlighted the "freedom to publish without fear of lawsuits," indicating that Artlist provides a sense of security and peace of mind for creators who are concerned about copyright issues.

Cons

• Download Limit Despite "Unlimited" Claims: One reviewer stated that although Artlist offers "unlimited downloads," they were immediately given a download limit upon purchasing the subscription. This could be considered misleading advertising and is a significant drawback for those who require a large number of assets.
• Music Accessibility Tied to Subscription: Another reviewer was disappointed to find out that the music they had added to their 'My Music' panel was not accessible after their subscription ended. This could be a major issue for those who assume that once they've downloaded music, it's theirs to keep.
• Lack of Transparency: The same reviewer who complained about music accessibility also mentioned a lack of transparency from Artlist. They felt that they were not adequately informed about the limitations of their subscription, particularly concerning the availability of downloaded music post-subscription.
• Limited Software Compatibility: The same reviewer who praised Artlist's customer service for issuing a refund did so because the templates they wanted were not compatible with their current software. This suggests that Artlist's library may not be as universally compatible as one might expect.
• Misleading Communication: A reviewer mentioned that they were advised via email that their music would always be available in the 'My Music' panel, only to find out this was not the case. This indicates that the company's communication can sometimes be misleading, which could lead to customer dissatisfaction.
• Legal Complexity: While Artlist does provide licenses for their music, a reviewer pointed out that the license is only active as long as the subscription is. This could be confusing for users who are not well-versed in copyright law and may assume that once they've downloaded a track, they can use it indefinitely.

Read Review